Skip navigation
Favorites
Sign up to follow your favorites on all your devices.
Sign up
All Scores
Odds by

Report: Mark Jackson demoted Brian Scalabrine for arguing with Warriors assistant coach Pete Myers

Mark Jackson

FILE - In this Jan. 14, 2014 file photo, Golden State Warriors head coach Mark Jackson points during the second half of an NBA basketball game against the New Orleans Pelicans in New Orleans. Jackson has been joking about “getting my Pop on” late this season. The reference to San Antonio Spurs coach Gregg Popovich, who has famously _ and often successfully _ rested his regulars during the NBA’s marathon season is a new concept to the Warriors, who are trying to give some starters breaks and still collect wins during the playoff push. (AP Photo/Jonathan Bachman, File)

AP

Something is going wrong in Golden State. Well-functioning teams don’t demote assistant coaches at this point in the season.

What’s so strange about this Brian Scalabrine saga: The Warriors, by all other appearances, are having an excellent year.

Led by their stout defense, the 44-27 Warriors have their best winning percentage in 22 seasons. And they’ve done it in a historically strong Western Conference.

So, what happened with Scalabrine?

Jordan Ramirez of Warriors World:

Following the Warriors 99-90 loss to the San Antonio Spurs last Saturday, assistant coaches Brian Scalabrine and Pete Myers engaged in a heated verbal altercation, likely leading to the reassignment of Scalabrine, according to sources.

Myers has a longer track record in coaching, having spent nine years as a Bulls assistant and even served twice as their interim coach. This is Scalabrine’s first season as a coach.

Perhaps more importantly, Myers has a longer track record with Jackson. They were Knicks teammates for parts of two seasons, 1988-89 and 1989-90. Scalabrine was the client of Warriors general manger Bob Myers, who previously worked as an agent.

It’s not difficult to see, if this report is true, where allegiances would fall.

But it’s important to remember with this report, as well as the initial one, everyone involved has an agenda. Because nobody is willing to attach their name to their claims, it’s difficult for us to evaluate the credibility of these sources.